Rom J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan-Mar;66(1):36-40. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2022.9.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Postoperative assessment of patients diagnosed with binocular cataract, who underwent two phacoemulsification treatments at different times, in terms of subjective experience of the two procedures. Material and method: The investigation is a prospective study based on patients of Ophthalmology Clinic of Mária Street in Budapest and the Ophthalmology Department in Târgu Mureş, between January 2020 and April 2021. After surgery, the patients were surveyed using questionnaires. A total of 53 responses from patients who had undergone cataract removal in both eyes were processed. Data was processed using Microsoft Office Excel and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1. Results: A statistically significant difference (p = 0.0008) in pain was found between the two interventions, with patients reporting greater pain after the second surgery compared to the first treatment. The subjective increase of visual acuity was significantly different (p=0.0156) between the two surgeries. After the first treatment, 37 patients affirmed that their visual acuity met their expectations, but, by the second operation, this had dropped to 31. There was also a statistically significant difference between the individually perceived duration of the two treatments (p=0.0013), with the most frequently reported duration of the first phacoemulsification treatment being 10 minutes (43.4%), and the second eye treatment being 20 minutes (37.7%). Assessing the asymptomaticity, a significant difference (p = 0.009) was registered between the two treatments, the asymptomatic reduction for the second operation being decreased by 28.1%. Conclusion: Patients treated for binocular cataract had significantly worse subjective symptoms during the second treatment.
PMID:35531447 | PMC:PMC9022155 | DOI:10.22336/rjo.2022.9
