Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 4. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000927. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze and compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG) in patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (GC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
METHOD: A multicenter retrospective cohort study and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed. We examined 367 patients with proximal GC who received NACT followed by PG (n=164) or TG (n=203) at two Chinese medical institutions between December 2009 and December 2022. Clinical and pathological parameters, postoperative complications, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. The dissection status and metastasis rate of each lymph node station were assessed.
RESULTS: After PSM, 80 patients were enrolled in both TG and PG group, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups (all P>0.05). The TG group had a higher total number of lymph nodes retrived (P<0.001) and longer operative time (P=0.007) compared to the PG group. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher postoperative complications was similar between the TG group (21.3%, 17/80) and the PG group (23.8%, 19/80) (P=0.850). The 5-year OS rates were 68.4% for the PG group and 66.0% for the TG group (P=0.881), while the 5-year RFS rates were 64.8% and 61.9%, respectively (P=0.571), with no statistically significant differences. Metastasis rates at lymph node stations #4d, #5, #6, and #12a were notably low in the TG group, with values of 2.74%, 0.67%, 1.33%, and 1.74%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: For proximal GC patients following NACT, PG maintains comparable curative potential and oncological efficacy to TG, making it a safe option.
PMID:38085808 | DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000927
