Eur J Radiol. 2021 Feb 25;138:109618. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109618. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare tomographic (TUS) with radiographic (RUS) union scores in nailed shaft fractures during normal healing and in non-unions.
METHODS: Two radiologists blinded to fracture age separately determined RUS and TUS in nailed femoral or tibial shaft fractures by analyzing the radiographic and CT examinations obtained in 47 patients during normal healing (early fracture group; 24 study participants, 17 men,19 tibias, mean fracture-CT delay 109 ± 57 days [42-204 days]) and in surgically proven non-united fractures (late fracture group, 23 patients, 14 men, 12 tibias, mean fracture-CT delay 565 ± 519 days[180-1983 days]). In both study groups, we determined the inter- and intra-observer agreement of RUS and TUS and compared TUS with RUS.
RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer agreement of RUS and TUS was very good in the early fracture group and good in the late fracture group for both readers. TUS correlated with RUS substantially in the early fracture group and only weakly in the late fracture group. TUS was statistically significantly lower than RUS in study participants with RUS ≥ 8 or 9 for R2 only and ≥ 10 for both readers in the early fracture group and in patients with RUS ≥ 8, 9 or 10 in the late fracture group for both readers.
CONCLUSION: RUS and TUS of nailed shaft fractures during normal healing or in non-unions are both feasible and reproducible. They yield similar values in fractures with no or limited callus. TUS yields lower values than RUS in fractures with callus.
PMID:33684696 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109618
