Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Maternal asthma and early foetal growth, the MAESTRO study

Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Mar 11. doi: 10.1111/cea.13864. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several maternal conditions can affect foetal growth, and asthma during pregnancy is known to be associated with lower birth weight and shorter gestational age.

OBJECTIVE: In a new Swedish cohort study on maternal asthma exposure and stress during pregnancy (MAESTRO), we have assessed if there is evidence of early foetal growth restriction in asthmatic women or if a growth restriction might come later during pregnancy.

METHODS: We recruited women from eight antenatal clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. Questionnaires on background factors, asthma status and stress were assessed during pregnancy. The participants were asked to consent to collection of medical records including ultrasound measures during pregnancy, and linkage to national health registers. In women with and without asthma, we studied reduced or increased growth by comparing the second trimester ultrasound with first trimester estimation. We defined reduced growth as estimated days below the 10th percentile and increased growth as days above the 90th percentile. At birth, the weight and length of the newborn and the gestational age was compared between women with and without asthma.

RESULTS: We enrolled 1693 participants in early pregnancy and collected data on deliveries and ultrasound scans in 1580 pregnancies, of which 18% of the mothers had asthma. No statistically significant reduced or increased growth between different measurement points were found when women with and without asthma were compared; adjusted odds ratios for reduced growth between first and second trimester 1.11 95 % CI (0.63 – 1.95) and increased growth 1.09 95% CI (0.68 – 1.77).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, we could not find evidence supporting an influence of maternal asthma on early foetal growth in the present cohort: Although the relatively small sample size, which may enhance the risk of a type II error, it is concluded that a potential difference is likely to be very small.

PMID:33705581 | DOI:10.1111/cea.13864

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala