Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Diverse Right Ventricular Remodeling Evaluated by MRI and Prognosis in Eisenmenger Syndrome With Different Shunt Locations

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun 21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27791. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital shunt location is related to Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) survival. Moreover, right ventricular (RV) remodeling is associated with poor survival in pulmonary hypertension.

PURPOSE: To investigate RV remodeling using comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and identify its relationship with prognosis in ES subgroups classified by shunt location.

STUDY TYPE: Prospective observational study.

POPULATION: Fifty-four adults with ES (16 with pre-tricuspid shunt and 38 with post-tricuspid shunt).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T/cine MRI with balanced steady-state free precession sequence, late gadolinium enhancement with inversion recovery segmented gradient echo sequence and phase-sensitive reconstruction, and T1 mapping with modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence.

ASSESSMENT: Demographics, clinical characteristics, hemodynamics, RV remodeling features (morphology, systolic function, RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling and myocardial fibrosis), and prognosis were compared between ES subgroups. The adverse endpoint was all-cause mortality or readmission for heart failure.

STATISTICAL TESTS: The independent samples t-test, Fisher’s exact test or Chi-squared test, and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: Compared to patients with post-tricuspid shunt, patients with pre-tricuspid shunt were significantly older and had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and poorer exercise tolerance. Pre-tricuspid shunt showed significantly larger RV dimensions (end-diastolic volume index: 185.81 ± 37.49 vs. 98.20 ± 36.26 mL/m2 ), worse RV ejection fraction (23.54% ± 12.35% vs. 40.82% ± 10.77%), and RV-PA decoupling (0.35 ± 0.31 vs. 0.72 ± 0.29). Biventricular myocardial fibrosis was significantly more severe in pre-tricuspid shunt than post-tricuspid shunt (extracellular volume, left ventricle: 35.85% ± 2.58% vs. 29.10% ± 5.20%; RV free wall: 30.93% ± 5.65% vs. 26.75% ± 5.15%). In addition, pre-tricuspid shunt demonstrated a significantly increased risk of adverse endpoint (hazard ratio: 2.938, 95% confidence interval: 1.204-7.172).

DATA CONCLUSION: ES with pre-tricuspid shunt might be a unique subtype with worse clinically decompensated RV remodeling and poor prognosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5.

PMID:34152058 | DOI:10.1002/jmri.27791

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala