Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Jul 4. doi: 10.1111/clr.13806. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Comparing PES/WES scores, modified success rate, survival, success, buccal bone thickness and patient-reported outcomes of immediate dental implants placed in fresh alveolar sockets using a flap or a minimal split-thickness envelope flap (MSTEF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants following random assignment into a flap or MSTEF group were placed immediately in anterior and premolar areas. Guided bone regeneration and autogenous connective tissue graft were used in all cases. A temporary prosthesis was provided followed by the final prosthesis at 16-18 weeks. Success and survival rates together with radiographic buccal bone thickness and patient satisfaction were evaluated at 12 months post-loading. The aesthetic outcome was evaluated through the Pink (PES) and White (WES) Aesthetic Score by 8 blind clinicians of different training background and incorporated in modified success criteria.
RESULTS: 28 implants were placed on 28 patients. No statistically significant differences were noted in PES (10.54 control vs. 10.80 test), WES scores (6.97 control vs. 6.95 test) or success criteria including aesthetic parameters (modified success criteria) for the different specialty groups (Range 69%-92%). In addition, no statistically significant differences were noted in survival (100%), success (100%), buccal wall thickness between control (0.72 +/-0.22) and test group (0.92+/-0.31) and patients’ reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dental implant treatment with flap/ MSTEF provided similar mean PES/WES scores, modified success rate, survival, mean buccal bone levels and patients’ satisfaction. However, aesthetic failures were common in both groups.
PMID:34218469 | DOI:10.1111/clr.13806
