Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Identifying outcome measures for atrial fibrillation value-based contracting using the Delphi method

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct 29:S1551-7411(21)00361-2. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.10.008. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Value-based contracts that tie payments for pharmaceuticals to predefined outcomes aim to promote value through shared risk and aligned incentives between manufacturers and payers.

METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study among diverse stakeholders (patients, providers, payers, pharmacy benefits managers, pharmaceutical company representatives) to identify top meaningful outcomes for inclusion in value-based contracts for atrial fibrillation medications. The final panel (n = 55) rated the importance of each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale and selected their top 3 most meaningful outcomes. Non-patient participants rated the feasibility of collecting each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (Likert scores ≥4/5 or selection of an outcome as most meaningful). Differences between stakeholder groups were examined using Fisher’s Exact Test.

RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for importance of 10 outcomes (Likert scale), where “preventing stroke or mini-stroke” reached 100% agreement (55/55). Eighty-one percent (44/54) of participants selected “preventing stroke or mini-stroke” as the most meaningful outcome (rank order question). The measures rated as most feasibly collected were “reducing hospitalizations” (97%, 36/37) followed by “preventing stroke or mini-stroke” and “reducing emergency department visits” (both 92%, 34/37). There were statistically significant differences between patients and non-patients [0% (0/17) vs 22% (8/37), P = 0.047] and patients and providers [0% (0/17) vs 39% (7/18), P = 0.008] in selection of “improving health-related quality of life” as a most meaningful outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings will inform the design of atrial fibrillation value-based pharmaceutical contracts and provide additional insight into preferences for outcomes which could be used to improve the quality of atrial fibrillation care.

PMID:34764046 | DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.10.008

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala