J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 11:dkab422. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab422. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimizing antifungal therapy is important to improve outcomes in severely immunocompromised patients.
OBJECTIVES: We analysed the in vitro interaction between pulmonary surfactant and antifungal agents used for management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.
METHODS: Amphotericin B formulations, mould-active triazoles and echinocandins were tested in vitro against 24 clinical isolates of different Aspergillus spp. with and without the addition of a commercial porcine surfactant (Curosurf®; Poractant alfa, Nycomed, Austria). The data are presented as MIC or minimum effective concentration (MEC) ranges, as MIC or MEC values that inhibited 90% of the isolates (MIC90 or MEC90) and as geometric mean (GM) MIC or MEC values.
RESULTS: For amphotericin B products, addition of surfactant to a final concentration of 10% led to a statistically significant reduction of the GM MIC for all Aspergillus isolates tested after 24 h (0.765 versus 0.552 mg/L; P < 0.05). For the mould-active triazoles, addition of 10% surfactant resulted in a significantly higher GM MIC at 48 h (0.625 versus 0.898 mg/L; P < 0.05). For the echinocandins, the addition of 10% surfactant led to a significantly higher GM MEC after both 24 h (0.409 versus 0.6532 mg/L; P < 0.01) and 48 h (0.527 versus 0.9378 mg/L; P < 0.01). There were no meaningful differences between individual members of the three existing classes of antifungal agents or between the different Aspergillus spp. tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Using EUCAST methodology, addition of porcine surfactant up to a concentration of 10% had a minor, and presumably non-relevant, impact on the in vitro activity of antifungal agents used in prophylaxis and treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.
PMID:34788449 | DOI:10.1093/jac/dkab422
