Braz Oral Res. 2021 Dec 6;35:e118. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0118. eCollection 2021.
ABSTRACT
Biodentine in endodontic practice has been widely investigated, but comprehensive histological descriptions of degenerative and inflammatory responses are not covered in most of the studies that compare pulp capping materials. This study aimed to evaluate pulpal responses to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA Angelus) and Biodentine, focusing on mineralized barrier formation and on inflammatory and degenerative events. 80 male Wistar rats were assigned to 5 groups, according to the materials used for pulp capping and coronal sealing (n=8 per group/period). The lower first molars were mechanically exposed, capped with either MTA or Biodentine, and restored with silver amalgam. In an additional test group, the teeth were capped and sealed with Biodentine. The teeth capped with gutta-percha and restored with silver amalgam served as positive control, whereas untreated teeth served as negative control. Pulpal responses and coronal sealing were evaluated after 14 or 21 days. Data was statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (p<0.05). Biodentine and MTA presented satisfactory results, showing a milder inflammatory response (p<0.0001) and more pronounced formation of mineralized barrier (p<0.0001) compared to the teeth capped with gutta-percha. As a restorative material, Biodentine kept coronal sealing in only 37.5% of the samples. Biodentine showed favorable properties in vital pulp therapy, being similar to MTA. However, it was not effective in protecting dental pulp from microleakage during the experimental period.
PMID:34878073 | DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0118
