Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Continuous and discontinuous radiofrequency energy delivery on the atrial free wall: Lesion transmurality, width, and biophysical characteristics

Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Nov 6;2(6Part A):635-641. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.10.012. eCollection 2021 Dec.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although lesion transmurality is required for durable pulmonary vein isolation, excess ablation is associated with increased risk of complications.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the impact of interrupted radiofrequency (RF) delivery conditions on lesion characteristics in the atrial free wall.

METHODS: Thirty-three (11 left atrial, 22 right atrial) RF ablation lesions were created in the atria of 6 swine using power control mode (25 W, target contact force 15 g) with 1 of 3 conditions: 15 seconds ablation (n = 8), 30 seconds ablation (n = 14), or 2 15-second ablations at the same site separated by a 2-minute interruption (15 seconds × 2) (n = 11).

RESULTS: Thirty of 33 lesions were transmural. Rates of transmurality (P = .45) and endocardial lesion width (5.6 ± 1.2 mm, P = .70) were similar between conditions. Mean tissue thickness was 1.7 ± 0.8 mm for transmural lesions. Wide variability in bipolar electrogram attenuation was observed across and within conditions and there were no significant between-group differences. Although impedance reductions were numerically greater in the 30-second and 15-second × 2 conditions (-14.6 ± 6.6 ohms and -14.0 ± 4.4 ohms, respectively) compared to the 15-second condition (-10.3 ± 6.4 ohms), variability was large, and differences were not statistically significant (P = .243). Impedance changes after ablation were largely transient.

CONCLUSION: A single 15-second ablation at 25 W (target contact force of 15 g) with good stability produced similarly sized lesions compared to 30-second ablations and 2 15-second ablations at the same site in atrial free wall tissue. These data suggest over-ablation in the atria is common, larger-diameter lesions may require greater power, and many clinically available parameters of lesion size may be unreliable on the posterior wall.

PMID:34988509 | PMC:PMC8703143 | DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2021.10.012

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala