J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb 21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28122. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nonenhanced MR angiography (MRA) studies are often used to manage acute and chronic large cervical artery disease, but lengthy scan times limit their clinical usefulness.
PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated cervical MRA and test its diagnostic performance.
STUDY TYPE: Prospective.
POPULATION: Patients with cervical artery disease (n = 32, 17 males).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; accelerated two-point Dixon three-dimensional Cartesian spoiled gradient-echo (FLEXA) and conventional time-of-flight MRA (cMRA) sequences.
ASSESSMENT: All patients underwent FLEXA (1’28″) and cMRA (6’47″) acquisitions. Quantitative evaluation (artery-to-background signal ratio and a blur metric) and qualitative evaluation using diagnostic performance measured by the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and vessel and plaque visualization scores from three board-certified radiologists’ (with 10, 11, and 12 years of experience) independent readings using maximum intensity projection (MIP) for luminal diseases and axial images for plaque. The reference standards were contrast-enhanced angiography and fat-saturated T1-weighted images, respectively.
STATISTICAL TESTS: All measures were compared between FLEXA and cMRA using the paired t, Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar’s, or chi-squared test, as appropriate. Interreader agreement was assessed using Cohen’s κ. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The artery-to-background signal ratio was significantly higher for FLEXA (FLEXA: 7.20 ± 1.63 [fat]; 4.26 ± 0.52 [muscle]; cMRA: 2.57 ± 0.49 [fat]), while image blurring was significantly less (FLEXA: 0.24 ± 0.016; cMRA: 0.30 ± 0.029). In luminal disease detection, sensitivity (FLEXA: 0.97/0.91/0.91; cMRA:0.71/0.69/0.63), specificity (FLEXA: 0.98/0.93/0.98; cMRA:0.93/0.85/0.92), PPV (FLEXA: 0.92/0.86/0.86; cMRA: 0.64/0.5/0.58), and NPV (FLEXA: 0.99/0.98/0.98; cMRA: 0.92/0.91/0.9) were significantly higher for FLEXA. interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect for FLEXA (κ = 0.82/0.86/0.78) and moderate to substantial for cMRA (κ = 0.67/0.56/0.57). MIP visualization scores were significantly higher for FLEXA, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement (FLEXA: κ = 0.83/0.86/0.82; cMRA: κ = 0.89/0.79/0.79). In plaque detection, sensitivity (FLEXA: 0.9/0.9/0.7; cMRA: 0.3/0.6/0.2) and specificity (FLEXA: 1/0.87/1; cMRA: 0.93/0.63/0.97) were significantly higher for FLEXA in two of three readers. The interreader plaque detection agreement was fair to substantial (FLEXA: κ = 0.63/0.69/0.48; cMRA: κ = 0.21/0.45/0.20). Side-by-side plaque and vessel wall visualization was superior for FLEXA in all readers, with moderate to substantial interreader agreement (plaque: κ = 0.73/0.73/0.77; vessel wall: κ = 0.57/0.40/0.39).
DATA CONCLUSION: FLEXA enhanced visualization of the cervical arterial system and improved diagnostic performance for luminal abnormalities and plaques in patients with cervical artery diseases.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
PMID:35188699 | DOI:10.1002/jmri.28122
