eNeuro. 2022 Apr 4:ENEURO.0447-21.2022. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0447-21.2022. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Visuomotor rotations are frequently used to study cognitive processes underlying motor adaptation. Explicit aiming strategies and implicit recalibration are two of these processes. A large body of literature indicates that both processes are in fact dissociable and mainly independent components that can be measured using different manipulations in visuomotor rotation tasks. Visual feedback is a crucial element in these tasks, and it therefore plays an important role when assessing explicit re-aiming and implicit recalibration. For instance, researchers have found timing of visual feedback to affect the contribution of implicit recalibration to learning: if feedback is shown only at the end of the movement (instead of continuously), implicit recalibration decreases. Similarly, participants show lower levels of implicit recalibration if visual feedback is presented with a delay (instead of immediately). We thus hypothesized that the duration of feedback availability might also play a role. The goal of this study was thus to investigate the effect of longer versus shorter feedback durations on implicit recalibration in human participants. To this end, we compared three feedback durations in a between-subject design: 200ms, 600ms and 1200ms. Using a large sample size, we found differences between groups to be quite small, to the point where most differences indicated statistical equivalence between group means. We therefore hypothesize that feedback duration, when only endpoint feedback is presented, has a negligible effect on implicit recalibration. We propose that future research investigate the effect of feedback duration on other parameters of adaptation, so as proprioceptive recalibration and explicit re-aiming.Significance statementKnowledge about explicit and implicit processes in motor adaptation forms a crucial aspect in our understanding of motor learning in general. We know that the smallest changes in visual feedback might lead to more or less implicit recalibration, which in turn can lead to changes in performance. One aspect, that has not yet been tested, is whether duration of visual feedback affects implicit recalibration. We find that changes implicit recalibration are very small, if they exist at all. This is an important finding which extends our knowledge about the factors that do or don’t influence implicit recalibration.
PMID:35383109 | DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0447-21.2022
