Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 11:keac448. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac448. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) to usual care on sleep efficiency, measured by polysomnography (PSG) immediately after the intervention at week 7. Secondary objectives included comparing the longer-term effect on sleep- and RA-related outcomes at week 26.
METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial using a parallel group design, the experimental intervention was six weeks’ nurse-led group-based CBT-I; the comparator was usual care. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle; missing data were statistically modelled using repeated-measures linear mixed effects models adjusted for the level at baseline.
RESULTS: The ITT population consisted of 62 patients (89% women), with an average age of 58 years and an average sleep efficiency of 83.1%. At primary end point, sleep efficiency was 88.7% in the CBT-I group, compared with 83.7% in the control group (difference: 5.03 [95% CI -0.37-10.43]; p = 0.068) measured by PSG at week 7. Key secondary outcomes measured with PSG had not improved at week 26. However, for all the patient-reported key secondary sleep- and RA-related outcomes, there were statistically highly significant differences between CBT-I and usual care (p < 0.0001), e.g. insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index: -9.85 [95% CI -11.77 to -7.92]), and the RA impact of disease (RAID: -1.36 [95% CI-1.92 to -0.80]) at week 26.
CONCLUSION: Nurse-led group-based CBT-I did not lead to an effect on sleep efficiency objectively measured with PSG. However, CBT-I showed improvement on all patient-reported key secondary sleep- and RA-related outcomes measured at week 26.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03766100.
PMID:35951745 | DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keac448
