Aust J Prim Health. 2024 Jul;30:PY24017. doi: 10.1071/PY24017.
ABSTRACT
Background Large datasets exist in Australia that make de-identified primary healthcare data extracted from clinical information systems available for research use. This study reviews these datasets for their capacity to provide insight into chronic disease care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and the extent to which the principles of Indigenous Data Sovereignty are reflected in data collection and governance arrangements. Methods Datasets were included if they collect primary healthcare clinical information system data, collect data nationally, and capture Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We searched PubMed and the public Internet for data providers meeting the inclusion criteria. We developed a framework to assess data providers across domains, including representativeness, usability, data quality, adherence with Indigenous Data Sovereignty and their capacity to provide insights into chronic disease. Datasets were assessed against the framework based on email interviews and publicly available information. Results We identified seven datasets. Only two datasets reported on chronic disease, collected data nationally and captured a substantial number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. No dataset was identified that captured a significant number of both mainstream general practice clinics and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. Conclusions It is critical that more accurate, comprehensive and culturally meaningful Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healthcare data are collected. These improvements must be guided by the principles of Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance. Validated and appropriate chronic disease indicators for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples must be developed, including indicators of social and cultural determinants of health.
PMID:38981000 | DOI:10.1071/PY24017
