J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Oct;13(10):4499-4504. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_221_24. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Over-medicalization of normal pregnancy is associated with unnecessary inductions of labor leading to operative deliveries. In a busy outpatient department (OPD) or low-resource setup where ultrasound availability, experience, and cost will be a concern, routine ultrasound at term can be avoided if the clinical estimation of fetal weight is more or less equal to the actual birth weight.
AIMS: To assess the reliability and validity of fetal weight estimation at term by ultrasound and clinical estimation.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy was done over a period of 1.5 years in a tertiary hospital, which included 100 women with term singleton pregnancies admitted in obstetric wards or labor room.
METHODS AND MATERIAL: To find out the agreement between actual birthweight and ultrasound fetal weight interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Mean difference plots (Bland-Altman plots) were done. The mean percentage error was compared with the consultant estimate and registrar estimate across groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values by clinical and ultrasound estimate were calculated for actual birth weight ≤ 2.5 kg.
RESULTS: Both methods of fetal weight estimation have moderate reliability in predicting the actual birth weight. The sensitivity of identifying birthweight < 2.5 kg babies by ultrasound was slightly higher. For birth weight less than 2.5 kg, there was an overestimation of fetal weight by clinical estimation done by postgraduate with mean percentage error being statistically significant as compared with ultrasound estimation.
CONCLUSIONS: In a developing country like ours where ultrasound is not readily available in all healthcare setups, the clinical method is an easy, cost-effective, simple one that can be used by all medical professionals after adequate training.
PMID:39629413 | PMC:PMC11610859 | DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_221_24
