Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 22;29(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the vertical misfit at the implant-abutment interface in external and internal connections across various implant brands, comparing original milled titanium abutments with laser-sintered cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) abutments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 160 implants from four different brands were utilized, with 80 featuring external connections (EC) and 80 internal connections (IC). Original milled titanium abutments (n = 160) and Co-Cr laser-sintered abutments (n = 160) were randomly attached to each connection type, following the manufacturer’s recommended torque. After undergoing thermal cycling, the vertical misfit was measured using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.
RESULTS: The original milled titanium abutments exhibited the lowest misfit values. Significant differences were identified between both abutment types for EC (d = 109.578 μm; p = 0.0001) and IC (d = 44.317 μm; p = 0.002). The EC with laser-sintered abutments demonstrated the highest marginal misfit values, with an average of nearly 30 μm, while a misfit value of 11.382 μm was achieved in the IC. Differences were observed among the brands for milled abutments in both EC and IC. Similarly, variations were also noted for the laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments in EC and IC configurations.
CONCLUSIONS: The vertical misfit of the original milled titanium abutments in all groups was within the clinically acceptable range for IC. The connection type significantly impacted the vertical misfit in laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments. Differences among the implant systems were observed for both connection types and abutment types evaluated.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using original milled titanium abutments, particularly in internal connection systems, can lead to better fit and stability at the implant-abutment interface, potentially reducing the risk of mechanical complications and improving long-term implant success.
PMID:39841269 | DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4
