Transplantation. 2024 Nov 8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005259. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) can increase the donor pool by allowing high-risk lungs to be further evaluated for transplant. Several EVLP platforms are currently in use. This study examines whether different EVLP platforms have any association with post-transplant outcomes.
METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried from February 28, 2018, to March 31, 2024, for adult double lung transplant recipients with EVLP data. EVLP platform was categorized as hospital EVLP, EVLP facility, mobile EVLP, or No EVLP. Recipients of EVLP lungs were statistically matched to recipients of No EVLP lungs on donor characteristics.
RESULTS: After matching, the final cohort included 1542 in the No EVLP group and 771 who received EVLP. Lungs placed on EVLP had significantly longer ischemic time than No EVLP (P < 0.001). Patients who received EVLP lungs had significantly longer post-transplant length of stay (≥25 d versus 21 d No EVLP, P < 0.001). Ischemic time (OR = 1.04, P = 0.008) and being in the ICU at the time of transplant (OR = 2.22, P < 0.001) were associated with higher rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD3). After adjusting for hospital status and ischemic time, there was no association between the EVLP modality and PGD3. Subgroup analysis showed that DCD recipients did not have worse short- or long-term outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no relationship between EVLP modality, PGD3, and post-transplant survival after matching donor quality and adjusting for ischemic time. Work should continue to focus on reducing ischemic times so EVLP can continue to increase the donor pool while limiting adverse effects.
PMID:40101107 | DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005259
