J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1111/jan.16945. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: This study engaged key stakeholders-older adults, family caregivers, home care support workers, nurses, and home healthcare leaders-to explore perspectives on essential components and integration into home care models, and to explore the role of their technology readiness for health smart homes adoption.
DESIGN: A qualitative methodology with a quantitative component, early-phase exploratory design.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews underwent qualitative thematic analysis, with cross-case analysis comparing stakeholder perspectives to identify convergences and divergences. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse Technology Readiness Index (TRI 2.0) survey data to provide background and context to the qualitative findings.
RESULTS: Among 18 participants-older adults (n = 6), family caregivers (n = 2), nurses (n = 7), and support workers/healthcare leaders (n = 3)-findings reflected optimism for health smart home adoption and its potential to support ageing in place. Nurses and care workers saw health smart home as a tool for improving care coordination and quality of life. Key adoption considerations included education, data visualisation, privacy, and security. Technology readiness scores were moderate, with nurses scoring highest (3.52), followed by caregivers (3.41), support workers (3.13), and older adults (3.10).
CONCLUSION: While stakeholders were open to integrating health smart home into home care, concerns around usability, security, and training must be addressed to facilitate adoption.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Findings suggest that while health smart home technology holds promise for enhancing ageing in place, varying levels of technology readiness across stakeholders highlight the need for tailored education and support strategies to ensure successful implementation.
PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Despite a strong preference for ageing in place among older adults, integrating health smart home technologies into home care remains challenging. Key issues include ensuring intuitive functionality, protecting privacy, and clarifying the roles of caregivers and healthcare professionals in a technology-enhanced care model. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding how health smart home solutions can be effectively tailored to support the diverse needs of older adults, family caregivers, and home care nurses and support workers.
MAIN FINDINGS: Stakeholders were generally optimistic about health smart home technologies supporting ageing in place and improving quality of life. Nurses and support workers highlighted the need for tailored data visualisations, alert parameters, and clear role guidelines. A novel finding was that older adults and family caregivers viewed health smart home as a way to reduce intrusive monitoring, promote independence, and maintain a familiar living environment. Family caregivers valued the ability to stay involved remotely through activity data, offering reassurance and peace of mind. Across all groups, privacy safeguards were seen as essential, with strong concerns about data security, transparent usage policies, and user control over data sharing.
IMPACT: Findings have implications for community-dwelling older adults, family caregivers, home care professionals, researchers, and technology developers. Insights from this study can inform the design of user-friendly health smart home technologies, shape future research, and guide tailored implementation strategies in home care settings.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An advisory group of community-dwelling older adults in Western Australia provided input on study design and methodology. Their recommendations led to the use of one-on-one interviews to ensure accessibility and relevance for older adults when exploring technology readiness and smart home integration. While the advisory group did not contribute to the data itself or its analysis, their feedback shaped the method of engagement to ensure its relevance and accessibility to potential participants.
PMID:40172858 | DOI:10.1111/jan.16945
