Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 26;48(1):445. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03616-9.
ABSTRACT
Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer is an effective surgical option for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) when nerve grafting is not applicable. It is performed via two approaches: anterior and posterior. Despite the theoretical advantages of the posterior approach, clinical trials have yielded variable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of anterior and posterior approaches for SAN to SSN transfer in restoring the Range of motion (ROM) and strength of shoulder abduction and external rotation in BPIs. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing anterior and posterior approaches for SAN to SSN transfer. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. via RevMan 5.4, meta-analyses were conducted. We identified eight comparative studies with 311 patients (n = 140 for posterior transfer, n = 171 for anterior transfer). Both approaches showed comparable outcomes with statistically significant advantages to the posterior approach by a modest but meaningful difference in shoulder abduction ROM (MD: 8.98°, 95% CI: 1.19 to 16.78, P = 0.02, I² = 0%) and in the Modified Medical Research Council (MRC), The posterior approach was associated with 4.78 times higher odds of achieving a grade ≥ M3 on the MRC scale (OR: 4.78, 95% CI: 1.43 to 15.96, P = 0.01, I² = 0%). We suggest that when functional gains are a priority, surgeons consider the posterior approach while still accounting for patient/surgeon specific factors and injury details.
PMID:40415160 | DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03616-9
