Mov Ecol. 2025 Jun 12;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40462-025-00567-0.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Animal movement is influenced by both the physical environment and social environment. The effects of both environments are not independent from each other and identifying whether the resulting movement trajectories are shaped by interactions between individuals or whether they are the result of their physical environment, is important for understanding animal movement decisions.
METHODS: Here, we assessed whether the commonly used methods for inferring interactions between moving individuals could discern the effects of environment and other moving individuals on the movement of the focal individual. We used three statistical methods: dynamic interaction index, and two methods based on step selection functions. We created five scenarios in which the animals’ movements were influenced either by their physical environment alone or by inter-individual interactions. The physical environment is constructed such that it leads to a correlation between the movement trajectories of two individuals.
RESULTS: We found that neglecting the effects of physical environmental features when analysing interactions between moving animals leads to biased inference, i.e. inter-individual interactions spuriously inferred as affecting the movement of the focal individual. We suggest that landscape data should always be included when analysing animal interactions from movement data. In the absence of landscape data, the inference of inter-individual interactions is improved by applying ‘Spatial+’, a recently introduced method that reduces the bias of unmeasured spatial factors.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to improved inference of biotic and abiotic effects on individual movement obtained by telemetry data. Step selection functions are flexible tools that offer the possibility to include multiple factors of interest as well as combine it with Spatial+.
PMID:40506736 | DOI:10.1186/s40462-025-00567-0
