Cureus. 2025 May 22;17(5):e84640. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84640. eCollection 2025 May.
ABSTRACT
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with limited evaluates the efficacy and safety of these treatments. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including 14 studies that compared multimodal therapies for early-stage MPM. Continuous variables were analyzed using random-effects modeling, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. The primary outcomes included physical function, social function, and lethargy. The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.14 to 0.45), social function (SMD: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.52 to 0.53), or lethargy (SMD: -0.34, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.27). Heterogeneity across studies was moderate to high (I²: 47%-76%). These findings suggest limited improvements in quality-of-life domains with experimental approaches compared to controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for individualized, multimodal treatment strategies in MPM management. While extrapleural pneumonectomy and extended pleurectomy/decortication offer specific benefits, their impact on quality of life varies and may not consistently provide significant improvements. Future research should focus on large-scale, randomized trials with standardized protocols to optimize treatment outcomes.
PMID:40546549 | PMC:PMC12182882 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.84640
