JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 16;13:e69328. doi: 10.2196/69328.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Wearable devices are increasingly used for monitoring health and detecting digital biomarkers related to chronic diseases such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). Although circadian rhythm disturbances are known to contribute to MetS, few studies have explored wearable-derived circadian biomarkers for MetS identification.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to detect and analyze sleep and circadian rhythm biomarkers associated with MetS using step count and heart rate data from wearable devices and to identify the key biomarkers using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 272 participants in the Korean Medicine Daejeon Citizen Cohort, collected between 2020 and 2023, including 88 participants with MetS and 184 without any MetS diagnostic criteria. Participants wore Fitbit Versa or Inspire 2 devices for at least 5 weekdays, providing minute-level heart rate, step count, and sleep data. A total of 26 indicators were derived, including sleep markers (midsleep time and total sleep time) and circadian rhythm markers (midline estimating statistic of rhythm, amplitude, interdaily stability, and relative amplitude). In addition, a novel circadian rhythm marker, continuous wavelet circadian rhythm energy (CCE), was proposed using continuous wavelet transform of heart rate signals. Statistical tests (t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test) and machine learning models-Shapley Additive Explanations, explainable boosting machine, and tabular neural network-were applied to evaluate marker significance and importance.
RESULTS: Circadian rhythm markers, especially heart rate-based indicators, showed stronger associations with MetS than sleep markers. The newly proposed CCE demonstrated the highest importance for MetS identification across all XAI models, with significantly lower values observed in the MetS group (P<.001). Other heart rate-based markers, including relative amplitude and low activity period, were also identified as important contributors. Although sleep markers did not reach statistical significance, some were recognized as secondary predictors in XAI-based analyses. The CCE marker maintained a high predictive value even when adjusting for age, sex, and BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified CCE and relative amplitude of heart rate as key circadian rhythm biomarkers for MetS monitoring, demonstrating their high importance across multiple XAI models. In contrast, traditional sleep markers showed limited significance, suggesting that circadian rhythm analysis may offer additional insights into MetS beyond sleep-related indicators. These findings highlight the potential of wearable-based circadian biomarkers for improving MetS assessment and management.
PMID:40669055 | DOI:10.2196/69328
