Cureus. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):e87059. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87059. eCollection 2025 Jun.
ABSTRACT
Background Medical education is adapting to meet the growing demands of healthcare and patient care complexities. Traditional clinical training often relies on limited patient encounters, which may not fully develop clinical competence. Simulation-based medical education (SBME) offers controlled, immersive environments for practicing clinical skills and decision-making without risking patient safety. While SBME has been well-studied in advanced training, its effectiveness in first- and second-year medical students remains underexplored. This study aims to explore and quantify pre-clerkship medical students’ perspectives on how SBME impacts confidence in clinical decision-making, communication, and clinical skills, compared to traditional learning methods alone. Methods This pre- and post-survey-based study assessed the impact of simulation (SIM) on students’ self-reported confidence in clinical decision-making, communication, and clinical skills. Six simulation scenarios that aligned with the undergraduate medical curriculum of one Canadian institution were conducted from October 2023 to March 2024. Participants completed pre- and post-simulation surveys using 5-point Likert scales. A total of 67 surveys were analyzed. Results All 67 surveys were analyzed (35 pre-, 32 post-simulation) using one-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. Pre-simulation responses indicated low baseline confidence, with only one item rated above neutrality. Post-simulation ratings showed statistically significant improvements across all domains (p < 0.01). Students also reported that they perceived simulation as more effective than traditional didactic learning in preparing them for clinical practice. Conclusions This exploratory study suggests that simulation-based education can enhance pre-clerkship students’ confidence in clinical decision-making, communication, and procedural skills, domains often underdeveloped at this stage of training. These findings offer early evidence that high-fidelity simulation may accelerate perceived clinical readiness. However, due to the small, self-selected sample, non-parallel survey design, and reliance on subjective outcomes, results should be treated as exploratory. Further multi-site studies using objective measures are needed to assess long-term impact on knowledge and skill retention as well as clinical performance.
PMID:40741557 | PMC:PMC12310303 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.87059
