Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 5;15(1):32368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16070-w.
ABSTRACT
In radiomics, feature selection methods are primarily used to eliminate redundant features and identify relevant ones. Feature projection methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA), are often avoided due to concerns that recombining features may compromise interpretability. However, since most radiomic features lack inherent semantic meaning, prioritizing interpretability over predictive performance may not be justified. This study investigates whether feature projection methods can improve predictive performance compared to feature selection, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and the F1, F0.5 and F2 scores. Models were trained on a large collection of 50 binary classification radiomic datasets derived from CT and MRI of various organs and representing different clinical outcomes. Evaluation was performed using nested, stratified 5-fold cross-validation with 10 repeats. Nine feature projection methods, including PCA, Kernel PCA, and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), were compared to nine selection methods, such as Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMRe), Extremely Randomized Trees (ET), and LASSO, using four classifiers. The results showed that selection methods, particularly ET, MRMRe, Boruta, and LASSO, achieved the highest overall performance. Importantly, performance varied considerably across datasets, and some projection methods, such as NMF, occasionally outperformed all selection methods on individual datasets, indicating their potential utility. However, the average difference between selection methods and projection methods across all datasets was negligible and statistically insignificant, suggesting that both perform similarly based solely on methodological considerations. These findings support the notion that, in a typical radiomics study, selection methods should remain the primary approach but also emphasize the importance of considering projection methods in order to achieve the highest performance.
PMID:40913054 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-16070-w
