Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Sep 21. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04795-6. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) remains a major complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), often leading to technique failure, hospitalization, and increased mortality. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare existing risk prediction models for PDAP and quantify their overall performance and key predictors.
METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, eight databases were systematically searched including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang, and SinoMed, covering literature from their inception to March 19, 2025. Data extraction focused on study design, participant characteristics, sample size, outcome definitions, predictors, and model performance. The bias risk assessment tool for prediction model studies (PROBAST) was employed to assess bias risk and applicability, while Stata 17.0 facilitated meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 11 logistic regression models were included. The reported area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.659 to 0.997, with a combined AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), indicating robust predictive performance. Four predictors associated with peritonitis were albumin (Alb) (OR = 0.672; 95% CI 0.475-0.868; P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR = 2.568; 95% CI 1.081-4.055; P < 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR = 1.377; 95% CI 1.065-1.689; P < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 3.549; 95% CI 1.272-5.825; P < 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite demonstrating strong predictive capabilities, the models exhibited high bias risks, primarily due to data sources and statistical methods. Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter studies with rigorous designs and external validation to enhance reliability and clinical applicability.
PMID:40975843 | DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04795-6
