Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Oct;44(10):1291-1297. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00297.
ABSTRACT
Site neutrality in payment practices has become a salient issue in the US health care debate, as rising prices have brought increased pressure for policy action. Although Medicare has received disproportionate attention, these policies could also apply to commercial insurers, particularly to address payment differentials between hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). Using 2024 Transparency in Coverage data provided by Clarify Health on commercial prices for three insurers (UnitedHealthcare, Cigna, and BlueCross BlueShield), we compared payments for thirteen common procedures across settings. Overall, in 2024, commercial prices were $1,489 (78 percent) higher in HOPDs than in ASCs, whereas Medicare prices were $633 (97 percent) higher. However, site payment differentials varied substantially across payers: Cigna had the lowest differentials between HOPDs and ASCs ($327), whereas United had the highest ($1,673). Cigna achieved this through provider selection, contracting with only 14 percent of HOPDs in applicable markets compared with an average of 76 percent for United and BlueCross BlueShield. If United and BlueCross BlueShield paid Cigna’s average HOPD rates for these procedures, together they would save approximately $1.4 billion a year. Our results suggest that payers can reduce site differentials through provider selection; they also imply that larger insurers with broader networks may continue to reimburse different sites differently in the absence of either government action or a shift in market dynamics.
PMID:41052389 | DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00297
