Gates Open Res. 2025 Nov 18;9:103. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.16372.1. eCollection 2025.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There has been steady progress and advancement of research in Africa. However, African researchers face numerous challenges among them, limited international recognition. This is due to the low discoverability and inclusion of their research outputs by indexers and databases. A lot of initiatives have attempted to address the challenge, however, there is a need for support to enhance the discoverability and inclusion of research outputs from Africa.
METHODS: We conducted a desk review of 1,116 journals hosted on the Sabinet journal repository and the African Journal Online (AJOL) platform. The factors that were considered to influence journals’ discoverability and inclusion include (i) the journals’ Open Access (OA) status, (ii) OA journals’ listing in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), (iii) the journals’ presence on the International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) portal, (iv) the membership of the journals’ publishers on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (v) the journals’ hosting on International Network for Advancing Science and Policy (INASP) and (vi) geographic location of the journals’ online publisher.
FINDINGS: A total of 1,116 journals were identified from the Sabinet and AJOL platforms. The highest proportion of journals was neither discovered by Google Scholar nor included in Scopus (63.2%). The study established one significant predictor of journal discoverability by Google Scholar and inclusion in Scopus. This was the journal listing on the ISSN portal which increased the odds of the journal being discoverable by Google Scholar and inclusion in Scopus by 2.033 and 5.451 respectively. Journals listed in the DOAJ but whose publishers were COPE members had significantly reduced odds of being discoverable by Google Scholar and being included in Scopus by 0.334 and 0.161 respectively. This suggests that the journal’s discoverability and inclusion are more nuanced and not always straightforward hence quality markers need to be aligned.
PMID:41268572 | PMC:PMC12626968 | DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.16372.1