Thorac Cancer. 2025 Nov;16(22):e70190. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70190.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic surgery (SATS) versus lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic surgery (LIATS) for anterior mediastinal tumors.
METHODS: Clinical data from patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to the surgical approach used: the SATS group (n = 679) and the LIATS group (n = 461). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients were included in the statistical analysis after screening and assessment. After propensity score matching, a total of 417 SATS patients were matched with 417 LIATS patients. In the analysis of the outcomes, the LIATS group had a shorter operation time than the SATS group (p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores on Postoperative Day 1 (p = 0.113), Day 2 (p = 0.189), or Day 3 (p = 0.462). Postoperative atelectasis was more common in the SATS group than in the LIATS group (p = 0.025). There were no perioperative deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: The SATS did not demonstrate significant improvements in postoperative pain compared with the LIATS. However, the LIATS was associated with shorter operative time in the overall cohort.
PMID:41277410 | DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.70190
