Psychol Med. 2025 Nov 25;55:e358. doi: 10.1017/S003329172510264X.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly recognized as a vital tool for tracking the fluctuating nature of mental states and symptoms in psychiatric research. However, determining the optimal sampling rate – that is, deciding how often participants should be queried to report their symptoms – remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, our study utilizes the Nyquist-Shannon theorem from signal processing, which establishes that any sampling rate more than twice the highest frequency component of a signal is adequate.
METHODS: We applied the Nyquist-Shannon theorem to analyze two EMA datasets on depressive symptoms, encompassing a combined total of 35,452 data points collected over periods ranging from 30 to 90 days per individual.
RESULTS: Our analysis of both datasets suggests that the most effective sampling strategy involves measurements at least every other week. We find that measurements at higher frequencies provide valuable and consistent information across both datasets, with significant peaks at weekly and daily intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: Ideal frequency for measurements remains largely consistent, regardless of the specific symptoms used to estimate depression severity. For conditions in which abrupt or transient symptom dynamics are expected, such as during treatment, more frequent data collection is recommended. However, for regular monitoring, weekly assessments of depressive symptoms may be sufficient. We discuss the implications of our findings for EMA study optimization, address our study’s limitations, and outline directions for future research.
PMID:41287919 | DOI:10.1017/S003329172510264X
