Phys Eng Sci Med. 2026 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s13246-025-01688-x. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Wrist pulse measurement offers significant insights into cardiovascular health. However, the application of various sensors, such as optical, pressure, image, and ultrasonic, is limited due to issues like bright environments, incompatibility with pressure adjustments, and system complexity. Recent studies suggest condenser microphones as promising alternatives, though the optimal type among various condenser microphones remains unclear. This study explores the application of three different condenser microphones using four regression-based machine learning models (Partial Least Square Regression, Ridge Regression, Principal Component Regression, and Nu-Support Vector Regression) for wrist pulse measurement based on pulse rate accuracy. One omnidirectional condenser microphone, previously used for wrist pulse measurement, and two commonly available unidirectional condenser microphones were evaluated. A mechanical system for pulse acquisition was developed, and data were collected from 27 healthy subjects using each microphone alternatingly. Extracted time-domain and statistical features were used as inputs to compare the predicted pulse rates with the ground truth pulse rate values. Results indicated that unidirectional condenser microphones were more accurate than the omnidirectional type. Among the unidirectional microphones, the one with a sensitivity range of – 50 to – 44 dB outperformed the microphone with a sensitivity range of – 40 to – 34 dB. The Nu-Support Vector Regression model exhibited the least errors, indicating superior predictive capabilities compared to the other models. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into selecting appropriate condenser microphones for wrist pulse measurement, offering a guiding framework for future research in this domain.
PMID:41528717 | DOI:10.1007/s13246-025-01688-x
