Ophthalmol Ther. 2026 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01301-0. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) burden patients and healthcare systems. Faricimab may reduce this burden, but robust data are lacking. This study aimed to systematically quantify the injection frequency reduction with faricimab compared to anti-VEGF agents and estimate Dutch budget impact.
METHODS: A systematic review of studies on patients with nAMD switching to faricimab was conducted in PubMed. A hybrid approach using artificial intelligence (NotebookLM) and manual verification was employed for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis determined the pooled mean difference in annual injections. A budget impact analysis estimated direct medical costs (drug and administration costs) over a 1-year time horizon using Dutch data.
RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 19 real-world studies (2231 patients) was conducted. Patients switched to faricimab for persistent fluid or to extend treatment intervals, resulting in a significant mean reduction of 2.65 injections in the first year (from 9.70 to 7.05; 95% confidence interval – 3.36 to – 1.93). The base-case analysis projected annual savings of approximately €79 million, corresponding to 96,235 fewer injections nationwide. Scenario analyses showed that substantial savings (€16 to €75 million) can be achieved when using faricimab in second- and third-line settings, although replacing first-line bevacizumab would increase costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching patients to faricimab reduced the injection frequency by two to three injections in the first year. Although evidence certainty was limited by statistical heterogeneity, the reduction was consistent across studies. Although replacing first-line bevacizumab increases costs, substantial savings are achievable in later lines. Strategic positioning of faricimab in the second-line yields significantly higher savings compared to third-line use, and could significantly lower the clinical, patient, and economic burden of nAMD care in the Netherlands. These findings provide quantified, real-world evidence to inform Dutch clinical practice and healthcare policy.
PMID:41543675 | DOI:10.1007/s40123-025-01301-0
