J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2026 Jan 19;33(2):e1054. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000001054. eCollection 2026 Apr 1.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy frequently precipitates intraprocedural hypoxemia. Although several recent randomized controlled trials suggest that high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNO) reduces intraprocedural hypoxemia during bronchoscopy, the overall certainty of this evidence remains insufficient. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of HFNO with that of conventional low-flow oxygen therapy (COT) during adult bronchoscopy.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults (18 y or older) undergoing bronchoscopy that compared HFNO with COT. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia during the procedure. The key secondary outcomes were total procedure time, bronchoscopy interruption, and lowest intraprocedural peripheral oxygen saturation. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated, and the certainty of evidence was assessed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251071548).
RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (12 study arms) comprising 1714 participants met the inclusion criteria. HFNO was found to significantly reduce the incidence of hypoxemic events compared with COT (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.26-0.59) and lowered the likelihood of procedure interruption (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.27-0.55). HFNO also maintained a higher nadir SpO2 (MD=4.5%, 95% CI: 3.02-5.99). No statistically significant difference was observed in the total procedure time (MD: -0.87 min, 95% CI: -1.99 to 0.25).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed HFNO reduces the incidence of intraprocedural hypoxemia and interruptions during bronchoscopy. Our findings support a selective approach, suggesting the benefits of HFNO are greater in high-risk patients.
PMID:41550007 | DOI:10.1097/LBR.0000000000001054
