J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2026 Jan 22;23(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01829-z.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) can quantify movements in daily routines but rely heavily on participant adherence over prolonged wear times.
METHODS: We analyzed accelerometry data from wrist-worn devices during short at-home episodes of prescribed exercises performed by 329 individuals living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a longitudinal study. We developed an automated and interpretable signal processing method to estimate four metrics describing exercise repetitions, i.e., their count, duration, intensity, and similarity. We examined their associations with time elapsed from enrollment and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) using linear mixed effect models. We also compared them with previously validated free-living metrics that require substantial sensor wear-time. Finally, we studied how many repetitions are sufficient to determine participants’ upper limb functioning.
RESULTS: Three out of four exercise metrics (all but count) demonstrated significant association with ALSFRS-R outcomes. The duration of exercise repetitions increased, while intensity and similarity of movement decreased over time (all p-value < 0.001), indicating longer but less vigorous and less consistent upper limb movements over time. Exercise intensity was determined as the most robust exercise-based predictor of changes in upper limb function, and it was comparable to free-living metrics, which required at 21 h of sensor wear time (R-squared 0.899 vs. 0.860, respectively). Sensitivity analysis indicated that as few as five exercise repetitions were sufficient to yield statistically significant associations with ALSFRS-R.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prescribed exercise can effectively quantify upper limb function and track longitudinal decline comparably to free-living observation. The proposed method may serve as an alternative that decreases participation burden, increases study adherence, and extends diagnostic accessibility.
PMID:41572285 | DOI:10.1186/s12984-025-01829-z
