Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2025 Nov 14;5(6):e001702. doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001702. eCollection 2025 Nov.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy is a critical intervention for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. However, significant barriers remain in its widespread implementation, particularly in low- to middle-income countries, including a shortage of trained physicians and limited access to advanced medical technologies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate current mechanical thrombectomy training methodologies and assess their effectiveness in improving procedural skills among neurointerventional teams.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eight studies were included, with 3 studies eligible for meta-analysis. We assessed training approaches, participant demographics, and procedural outcomes using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool and performed statistical analysis using OpenMetaAnalyst software.
RESULTS: Various training modalities, including virtual reality simulations and hands-on workshops, consistently demonstrated positive effects on procedural skills and professional confidence, demonstrating significant improvements across multiple metrics. Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed statistically significant reductions in total procedure time (average decrease of 17.84 minutes, 95% CI: [-22.19 to -13.48]), number of handling errors (decreased by 6.34 errors, 95% CI: [-13.16 to 0.48]), contrast volume (decreased by 27.35 mL, 95% CI: [-45.11 to -9.60]), and fluoroscopy time (reduced by 8.07 minutes, 95% CI: [-10.71 to -5.44]). Participants showed increased procedural steps completed, with an average increase of 6.52 steps (95% CI: [3.99-9.05]).
CONCLUSION: Structured, simulation-based mechanical thrombectomy training programs can significantly enhance procedural skills, clinical decision-making, and professional confidence among neurointerventional teams, potentially improving stroke care.
PMID:41608732 | PMC:PMC12697599 | DOI:10.1161/SVIN.124.001702
