J Neurosurg Spine. 2026 Mar 6:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2025.9.SPINE241288. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Limited research has explored the impact of predominant back pain (pBP) versus predominant leg pain (pLP) in patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression (UBE-LD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), between patients with pBP and pLP who underwent UBE-LD.
METHODS: Patients who underwent primary UBE-LD were divided into either the pBP or pLP cohort. Exclusion criteria included patients with a diagnosis of degenerative scoliosis, trauma, malignancy, or infection. Demographic, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were compared between cohorts using inferential statistics. PROMs were collected at preoperative and postoperative 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month time points. Assessed PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical component score (PCS), VR-12 mental component score (MCS), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). MCID attainment was determined by comparing the change in PROMs to established thresholds in the literature.
RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included in the study, with 52 in the pBP cohort and 46 in pLP cohort. After analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic or perioperative characteristics between the two groups. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus (81.6%), central stenosis (93.9%), and foraminal stenosis (77.6%). At 6 months, both cohorts experienced significant postoperative improvements in PROMIS-PF, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, VR-12 PCS, and ODI scores (all p ≤ 0.011). VR-12 MCS scores did not demonstrate sustained postoperative improvement in either cohort. High rates of MCID achievement were observed across both cohorts for multiple PROMs, with no statistically significant differences in MCID attainment between patients with pBP and pLP at any postoperative time point.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the preoperative predominant pain location, patients undergoing UBE-LD reported significant improvements in physical function, back and leg pain, and disability. Patients in both cohorts demonstrated improvements in mental health outcomes, with comparable MCID achievement rates for VR-12 MCS. These findings suggest that UBE-LD might be effective for patients with both predominant back and leg pain presentations, although differences in specific outcome domains should be interpreted with caution due to potential selection bias. Consideration of predominant pain location might help inform preoperative patient counseling regarding expected outcomes following UBE-LD.
PMID:41791117 | DOI:10.3171/2025.9.SPINE241288
