JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Mar 2;9(3):e261068. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.1068.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: State-level abortion restrictions in the US enforced after the June 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court decision have worsened geographic, racial, and socioeconomic inequities in abortion access, warranting investigation of experiences for individuals who travel out of state to seek abortion care.
OBJECTIVES: To highlight the obstacles abortion seekers must overcome to obtain care, to identify common barriers and facilitators of interstate abortion travel, and to offer recommendations for abortion organizations, policymakers, and advocates to expand access for individuals living in states with abortion bans.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study analyzed data obtained from out-of-state participants collected as part of a larger cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. All English- and Spanish-speaking patients from out of state who were at least 16 years of age and medically cleared for research attending 2 abortion clinics in Illinois between September and November 2023 were eligible.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Participants completed a self-administered survey and a semistructured interview. Directed content analysis was used to identify emergent and crosscutting themes.
RESULTS: In total, 33 individuals (all self-identified as female or a woman) completed the survey and interview. Most participants were between 20 and 24 years of age (n = 12 [36%]) or 30 years or older (n = 12 [36%]), and from southern US states with a total abortion ban (n = 25 [76%]). From the time participants decided to terminate their pregnancy to the day of the abortion appointment, they experienced a median of 14.0 days of delay, with a mean (SD) of 29.6 (36.5) days of delay. Patient journeys of seeking abortion were categorized into 3 phases: information gathering, planning finances and travel, and traveling and completing the appointment. Participants reflected on how restrictive policies in their home states deepened abortion stigma and stifled access to accurate information. Most participants encountered their longest delays in the information-gathering phase, as they had to find legitimate clinics, often without any referrals, and navigate the complex web of laws between states. When patients had personal financial security, strong social support, or were in geographic proximity to a state in which abortion was legal, their journeys were facilitated.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional qualitative study of participants traveling across state lines for abortion, the policy landscape and abortion stigma of the home state, information and resource availability, and interpersonal support shaped their journeys in the post-Dobbs landscape. To improve cross-state abortion access for individuals in states with abortion restrictions or bans, policy change should be coupled with increased visibility of accurate information, charitable funding, and abortion stigma reduction. Abortion support organizations and the public should continue to enable access through social support services, such as volunteer drivers and abortion doulas.
PMID:41801198 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.1068
