JMIR Form Res. 2026 Mar 23;10:e85452. doi: 10.2196/85452.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are widely used in various health care settings. In Japan, pressure ulcers are becoming a major concern in an aging society due to their increasing prevalence. However, management is often handled by nonspecialists in wound care due to regional disparities in specialist availability.
OBJECTIVE: To provide support for nonspecialists in wound care, we developed a prototype smartphone-based CDSS for pressure ulcer management. The system prompts users to answer questions about the wound’s condition and recommends appropriate ointments and wound dressings by using a safety-first approach. This study aims to evaluate the utility of this system.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover pilot study involving 28 general internal medicine (GIM) physicians. Participants were randomly assigned to group A (intervention-control) or group B (control-intervention). Participants evaluated 10 standardized pressure ulcer photographs and selected the most appropriate ointment and wound dressing for each. The unit of analysis was the individual response to each question (N=280 total observations). We used generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable correlation structure to account for within-subject clustering and adjust for potential period and sequence effects.
RESULTS: The overall correct response rate during the intervention phase was significantly higher than that during the control phase (49.3% vs 4.3%, respectively). After adjusting for clustering and crossover biases, the use of CDSS was associated with a 29.1-fold increase in the odds of a correct response (95% CI 8.2-103; P<.001). Secondary analyses revealed significant improvements in ointment selection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.8; P<.001) and wound dressing selection (aOR 8.9, 95% CI 4.9-16.1; P<.001). However, no significant period (P=.11) or sequence (P=.25) effects were observed for the primary outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The prototype CDSS improved the accuracy of treatment decisions made by GIM physicians in a pilot study that used photographs and fixed options. Within the parameters of this investigation, CDSS effectively guided participants toward standardized, safety-oriented choices as defined by our scoring criteria.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000057294; https://tinyurl.com/36a6vvah.
PMID:41871340 | DOI:10.2196/85452
