J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2026 Mar 30. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000003195. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative visual outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing resection of craniopharyngioma via endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial craniotomy approaches.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 pediatric patients (74 eyes) who underwent resection of histologically confirmed craniopharyngioma at a tertiary center between 1995 and 2023. Ophthalmologic evaluations included best-corrected visual acuity (VA), optic nerve findings, and visual fields. Outcomes were assessed at early, intermediate, and long-term follow-up and compared by surgical approach.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (68%) underwent craniotomy and 12 (32%) endoscopic resection. Preoperatively, 51% had normal vision in both eyes, while 6 were legally blind. Postoperatively, no significant differences in VA or visual fields were observed between approaches at any interval. Optic nerve pallor was somewhat more frequent in the endoscopic group, though not statistically significant. Gross total resection was achieved in 66% of endoscopic versus 34% of craniotomy cases. Most craniotomies (88%) occurred before 2015, compared with 16% of endoscopic cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Both endoscopic and transcranial approaches yielded comparable visual outcomes in pediatric craniopharyngioma surgery. Rates of gross total resection were higher in the endoscopic cohort, suggesting that surgical approach should remain anatomy-driven, with either technique capable of preserving visual function in appropriately selected patients.
PMID:41921232 | DOI:10.1097/MPH.0000000000003195
