J Burn Care Res. 2026 Apr 9:irag049. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irag049. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Electrical injuries represent a small proportion of burn admissions but are associated with substantial morbidity. Prior studies suggest demographic and regional disparities in burn injury incidence and outcomes. This study aimed to compare electrical versus non-electrical burn injuries and assess regional differences in patient and burn characteristics, and outcomes using the American Burn Association’s Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using adult admissions from 2020 to 2022 to compare electrical to other types of burns. Outcomes included length of stay, mortality, discharge disposition, and insurance status. Regional analyses were based on the five ABA regions in the USA. Statistical comparisons used multivariate analyses, including propensity score matching. . Of a total of 63,269 patients, 2,042 (3.3%) sustained electrical injuries. These patients were younger (average age 40), predominantly male (92.2%), more likely to be injured at work (61.9%) and disproportionately Hispanic/Latino (21.9%). In the Southern region, electrical injuries resulted in significantly shorter median hospital stays than non-electrical injuries (2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.0001) shorter ICU stays (3 vs. 4 days, p ≤ 0.001). Mortality was consistently lower among electrical injury patients (2.2% vs. 3.7%, p ≤ 0.012). 52.7% of patients in the sample were treated in the Southern region, which also had the highest rate of electrical injuries in the country.The ABA Southern region bears a disproportionate burden, particularly among Hispanic/Latino and uninsured patients. These findings highlight the need for region-specific prevention, improved safety training, and equitable access to care.
PMID:41966997 | DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irag049
