JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Apr 1;9(4):e266100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.6100.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic disorder associated with premature cardiovascular disease. Genetic cascade screening is recommended but remains underused due to privacy laws that prevent clinicians from directly contacting at-risk relatives.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether implementing a web-based communication platform in a patient-mediated genetic cascade screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia increases uptake compared with usual care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, multicenter, implementation randomized clinical trial (CATCH) was conducted between November 1, 2020, and October 31, 2023, at 7 cardiovascular prevention or lipid clinics across Switzerland, representing French-, German-, and Italian-speaking regions. Adults aged 16 years or older with genetically confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia and at least 1 eligible first-degree relative living in Switzerland participated. A total of 87 index patients with 359 eligible first-degree relatives were randomized by family cluster (1:1) to the intervention or usual care arm.
INTERVENTION: A secure web-based platform allowing participants to send preprepared electronic messages (email or text) to their relatives, linking them directly to participating centers for genetic testing.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was cascade screening uptake, defined as the proportion of eligible first-degree relatives undergoing genetic testing within 6 months. The secondary outcome was new cases identified.
RESULTS: Among 221 adults screened across multiple families, 87 (39.4%) had genetically confirmed familia hypercholesterolemia (median [IQR] age, 49.2 [16.4-83.7] years; 46 [52.9%] female; median [IQR] highest low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 289.58 [139.00-498.07] mg/dL); 43 were randomized to the usual care arm, and 44 were randomized to the intervention arm. Among the 359 eligible relatives (median family size, 4), 99 (27.6%) underwent genetic testing. Uptake was higher in the intervention arm (30.4%; 95% CI, 22.0%-40.4%) than in usual care arm (16.7%; 95% CI, 10.1%-26.3%), yielding an odds ratio of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.06-4.51; P = .03). New case identification was also greater (17.0% vs 8.1%; odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.07-5.05; P = .03). Newly identified patients were often untreated or had modifiable risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial of patient-mediated genetic cascade screening supported by a web-based platform, participation in genetic testing and detection of familial hypercholesterolemia was increased compared with usual care. These results suggest that the use of digital communication tools enhanced the reach and effectiveness of genetic screening programs within privacy-regulated health systems.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04419090.
PMID:41973423 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.6100
