Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Extended Follow-up from the Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-risk Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate (SHARP) Consortium: Updated Analysis of 440 Patients

Eur Urol Oncol. 2026 Apr 10:S2588-9311(26)00078-7. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.03.019. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) do not undergo stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in part because of the limited evidence of long-term outcomes. We report long-term efficacy and toxicity outcomes for men treated with SBRT for HRLPC.

METHODS: Individual patient data from ten prospective clinical studies evaluating SBRT for HRLPC across nine institutions were pooled in the Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate consortium. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-yr biochemical recurrence (BCR) and distant metastasis (DM), stratified by receipt of intensified treatment (≥12 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] with extremely dose-escalated [≥8 Gy/fraction] prostate-directed SBRT). The impact of intensified treatment on BCR-free survival and DM-free survival was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was analyzed using time-to-event models.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In 440 patients with a median follow-up time of 60.4 mo, 5-yr BCR and DM rates were 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17-26%] and 9.2% (95% CI = 6.2-12%), respectively. In the 93 patients (21%) who received intensified treatment, 5-yr BCR and DM rates were 7.4% (95% CI = 1.7-13%) and 3.7% (95% CI = 0-7.9%), respectively. Receipt of intensified therapy was associated with a significant reduction in both BCR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38 [95% CI = 0.20-0.74], p = 0.005) and DM (HR = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.18-0.99], p = 0.049). For the overall cohort, 5-yr rates of grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity were 23% (95% CI = 19-27%) and 10% (95% CI = 7-13%), respectively. Limitations include heterogeneous treatment techniques and the nonrandomized nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The safety and efficacy profile of SBRT for HRLPC remains favorable at long-term follow-up, and SBRT should be integrated into shared decision-making for treatment of HRLPC.

PMID:41966956 | DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2026.03.019

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala