Prog Orthod. 2026 May 26;27(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40510-026-00624-3.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: To quantify and compare the three-dimensional (3D) deviations of crown and root movements produced by two clear aligner systems based on different materials-SmartTrack (ST) and MasterControl S (MCS)-in first premolar extraction cases using a 3D crown-root registration approach.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 29 patients (58 dental sides) treated with ST (n = 15) or MCS (n = 14). Pretreatment (T0) CBCT images were integrated with T0 and post-treatment (T1) intraoral scans and superimposed using palatal rugae as reference structures. Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were applied to estimate between-material differences while adjusting for age, sex, and standardized planned movement magnitude. Estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: The two systems demonstrated no statistically significant difference in deviation in sagittal crown retraction of the maxillary central incisor (U1) (ST: 1.25 (1.30) mm; MCS: 2.13 (1.82) mm; LMM difference: – 0.81 mm; 95% CI – 1.89-0.28; P = 0.145). MCS demonstrated smaller deviation in sagittal root positioning for the second premolar (U5) (difference: 1.07 mm; 95% CI 0.21-1.93; P = 0.015) and first molar (U6) (difference: 1.04 mm; 95% CI 0.13-1.94; P = 0.025). ST showed improved control of U5 axial inclination (difference: 3.33°; 95% CI 0.27-6.39; P = 0.033) and torque (difference: 3.04°; 95% CI 0.08 to 6.00; P = 0.044). Both systems exhibited a consistent “roller-coaster effect”, with no significant difference in unplanned U1 extrusion (difference: 0.14 mm; 95% CI – 0.73-1.02; P = 0.747).
CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical performance of clear aligner systems appears to vary depending on tooth position and movement vector. SmartTrack demonstrated better control of premolar angulation and torque, whereas MasterControl S showed closer agreement with the planned sagittal root position.
PMID:42189428 | DOI:10.1186/s40510-026-00624-3
