BMC Nutr. 2026 Jun 5. doi: 10.1186/s40795-026-01360-x. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief, Theory of Planned Behavior-based educational program on weight management and related health outcomes among university employees.
METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study conducted at two major universities in Erbil, Iraq, 200 employees with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² self-selected into an intervention (n = 100) or control (n = 100) group. The intervention consisted of five individual 35-40-minute sessions delivered over 12 weeks and covered obesity awareness, culturally adapted nutrition education, physical activity, and behavior-change strategies. The control group received only standard written materials. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference. Secondary outcomes included lipid profile, fasting glucose, quality of life (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite [IWQOL-Lite]), dietary quality, and physical activity. All assessments were performed at baseline and 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a mean weight loss of 7.46 kg (95% CI 6.44-8.48) compared with a gain of 0.58 kg in the control group (adjusted difference – 8.04 kg; p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 2.40). 79% of intervention participants lost ≥ 5% of their initial body weight (versus 0% in controls), and 41% lost ≥ 10%. Significant improvements were also observed in BMI, waist circumference, lipid profile, quality of life, and dietary quality (all p < 0.001; d > 1.8). Mediation analysis indicated that improvement in dietary quality accounted for 82% of the observed association between group assignment and change in BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: A brief, low-cost, culturally adapted educational intervention delivered in the workplace was associated with exceptionally large weight loss, cardiometabolic benefits, and psychosocial gains, with perfect retention. These findings suggest that this model may offer a promising approach for obesity management in Middle Eastern settings. However, confirmation in randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up is required before firm conclusions regarding scalability and effectiveness can be drawn.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was not prospectively registered in a clinical trial registry because it employed a quasi-experimental design with participant self-selection rather than random allocation. However, the full study protocol including all primary and secondary outcomes, eligibility criteria, intervention details, and the statistical analysis plan was finalized, approved by the Hawler Medical University Ethics Committee (reference HMU-REC-2024-18, 15 September 2024), and locked prior to the start of participant recruitment and data collection. No outcomes were added, removed, or modified after data inspection, and no post-hoc analyses were conducted beyond those pre-specified in the protocol. The manuscript adheres fully to the TREND reporting standards for non-randomized evaluations.
PMID:42249502 | DOI:10.1186/s40795-026-01360-x
