Dent Med Probl. 2026 May-Jun;63(3):825-831. doi: 10.17219/dmp/217233.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Various parameters are used in cephalometric diagnosis to assess the sagittal discrepancy of the maxillary bases.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the role of the horizontal and vertical dispersion of anthropometric landmarks used for plotting, and to assess the reliability of the selected cephalometric parameters.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The material consisted of 24 randomly selected cephalometric radiographs. They were analyzed twice, 7 days apart, by 15 orthodontists. The horizontal and vertical dispersion (x, y) of individual anthropometric landmarks was assessed using the mean reference value, and the reliability of individual landmarks and measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2.1)).
RESULTS: The ICC(2.1) for each landmark ranged from 0.9907 to 0.9998. The ICC(2.1) for individual sagittal discrepancy measurements averaged 0.9370 to 0.9842. The highest reliability was achieved for the ANB, W, Sar, Wits, Tau, and Yen measurements, respectively. The obtained results indicate excellent reliability in determining landmarks. The measurements of the selected parameters assessing the sagittal incongruence relationship between the maxilla and the mandible also demonstrated excellent reliability.
CONCLUSION: s The highest reliability in assessing the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible continues to be demonstrated by the ANB angle. The high and comparable values of the Sar, W, Tau, and Yen angles indicate the possibility of using these parameters interchangeably or complementarily in diagnosis and treatment planning, especially in borderline cases.
PMID:42497350 | DOI:10.17219/dmp/217233
