Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 17. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13896. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To operationalize an intersectionality framework using a novel statistical approach and with these efforts, improve the estimation of disparities in access (i.e., wait time to treatment entry) to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment beyond race.
DATA SOURCE: Sample of 941,286 treatment episodes collected in 2015-2017 in the United States from the Treatment Episodes Data Survey (TEDS-A) and a subset from California (n = 188,637) and Maryland (n = 184,276), states with the largest sample of episodes.
STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective subgroup analysis used a two-step approach called virtual twins. In step 1, we trained a classification model that gives the probability of waiting (1 day or more). In step 2, we identified subgroups with a higher probability of differences due to race. We tested three classification models for step 1 and identified the model with the best estimation.
DATA COLLECTION: Client data were collected by states during personal interviews at admission and discharge.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Random forest was the most accurate model for the first step of subgroup analysis. We found large variation across states in racial disparities. Stratified analysis of two states with the largest samples showed critical factors that augmented disparities beyond race. In California, factors such as service setting, referral source, and homelessness defined the subgroup most vulnerable to racial disparities. In Maryland, service setting, prior episodes, receipt of medication-assisted opioid treatment, and primary drug use frequency augmented disparities beyond race. The identified subgroups had significantly larger racial disparities.
CONCLUSIONS: The methodology used in this study enabled a nuanced understanding of the complexities in disparities research. We found state and service factors that intersected with race and augmented disparities in wait time. Findings can help decision makers target modifiable factors that make subgroups vulnerable to waiting longer to enter treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
PMID:34657287 | DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13896
