Clin J Pain. 2021 Dec 31. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001017. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: First, we aimed to determine the feasibility of virtual reality (VR) distraction for children with cancer undergoing subcutaneous port (SCP) access. Second, we aimed to estimate preliminary treatment effects of VR compared to an active distraction control (iPad).
METHODS: A single-site pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing VR to iPad distraction was conducted. Eligible children were aged 8-18 years undergoing treatment for cancer with upcoming SCP needle insertions. Intervention acceptability was evaluated by child, parent, and nurse self-report. Preliminary effectiveness outcomes included child-reported pain intensity, distress, and fear. Preliminary effectiveness was determined using logistic regression models with outcomes compared between groups using pre-procedure scores as covariates.
RESULTS: Twenty participants (mean age 12▒y) were randomized to each group. The most common diagnosis was acute lymphocytic leukemia (n=23, 58%). Most eligible children (62%) participated, and one withdrew after randomization to the iPad group. Nurses, parents, and children reported the interventions in both groups to be acceptable, with the VR participants reporting significantly higher immersion in the distraction environment (P=0.0318). Although not statistically significant, more VR group participants indicated no pain (65% vs. 45%) and no distress (80% vs. 47%) during the procedure compared to the iPad group. Fear was similar across groups, with approximately 60% of the sample indicating no fear.
DISCUSSION: VR was feasible and acceptable to implement as an intervention during SCP access. Preliminary effectiveness results indicate that VR may reduce distress and distress compared to iPad distraction. These data will inform design of a future full-scale RCT.
PMID:34974512 | DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001017
