ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jan 3. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13797. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Contemporary heart failure (HF) classification based on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is limited for comprehensive assessment of LV function. We aimed to validate the feasibility of the contraction-relaxation coupling index (CRC) as a novel predictor for clinical outcomes in patients with acute HF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3266 consecutive patients (median age: 74 years, 53% male) with acute HF were included. CRC was defined as the ratio of end-diastolic elastance (LV end-diastolic pressure/stroke volume) to end-systolic elastance (LV end-systolic pressure/end-systolic volume). The risk for 1 year composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF (primary outcome) was compared after group categorization using CRC tertiles (Tertile 1: CRC ≤ 0.17, Tertile 2: 0.17 < CRC ≤ 0.40, and Tertile 3: 0.40 < CRC). The median CRC was 0.3 and the median LVEF was 42%. After adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic covariates, CRC was an independent predictor for the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-2.07 in Tertile 3 and HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.44 in Tertile 2 when compared with Tertile 1; HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.33 per one-standard deviation increment in CRC). The risk model with CRC showed better performance in outcome discrimination than the model with LVEF (c-statistic 0.701 vs. 0.699, P for difference <0.001). Patients with higher CRC demonstrated better effectiveness of neurohormonal blockade for the primary outcome compared with those with lower CRC (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.29-0.50 in Tertile 3 and HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.89 in Tertile 1).
CONCLUSIONS: CRC provides an independent value for outcome prediction in patients with acute HF. CRC would be a sensitive indicator for prognostic risk stratification and for predicting treatment response to the neurohormonal blockade.
PMID:34981649 | DOI:10.1002/ehf2.13797
