Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 20;40(6):401-405. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20210329-00175.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the normative references in occupational disease diagnostic criteria and explore the relevant characteristics of occupational disease diagnostic criteria in China, aiming to provide the basis for improving the system of occupational disease diagnostic criteria. Methods: From January to March 2021, the text and normative references of occupational disease diagnostic criteria were retrieved, and the database was established with Excel 2013, and the data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software and Ucinet 6.0 software. The distributions of normative references were statistically analyzed by frequency analysis. The network density and centrality of occupational disease diagnostic criteria were analyzed by social network analysis. The network topology of relevant relationship network of occupational disease diagnostic criteria was drawn. Results: Among 115 occupational disease diagnostic criteria, 105 criteria cited 146 normative references, a total of 431 times. The normative documents cited more frequently were GB/T 16180 (91 times), GBZ 76 (37 times) and GBZ 73 (23 times). The number of normative references in GBZ 188 and GBZ/T 238 was large, 87 and 13 respectively. The results of social network analysis showed that the network density was 0.0281. The relative degree centrality was 3.089, and the top three criteria were GB/T 16180 (55.152), GBZ 188 (53.333) and GBZ 76 (23.636). The closeness centrality was 7.773 and the top three criteria were GB/T 16180 (8.735), GBZ 188 (8.730) and GBZ 76 (8.333). The betweenness centrality was 0.824 and the top three criteria were GBZ 188 (38.836), GB/T 16180 (38.301) and GBZ/T 238 (10.407). And GB/T 16180, GBZ 188, GBZ 76, GBZ 73 and GBZ 59 were at the core of the network topology of relationship network of occupational disease diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: The network density of occupational disease diagnostic criteria in China is low, and the relevant relationship is not close. GB/T 16180, GBZ 188, and GBZ 76 are node standards and should be the focus of the next standard implementation tracking.
PMID:35785890 | DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20210329-00175
