Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Aug 8. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009521. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The 2020-2021 residency application cycle marked the first year of fully virtual integrated plastic surgery interviews. The virtual format was a double-edged sword for applicants with several advantages such as reduced costs and time lost from travel and disadvantages as the novel format introduced new stressors on top of an already demanding process. Concerns included unfair interview invitation (II) distribution, interview “hoarding,” and assessing “fit” virtually. In this study, we aimed to understand applicants’ experiences of the 2020-2021 virtual plastic surgery interview cycle.
METHODS: A survey was sent to 330 applicants in the 2020-2021 integrated plastic surgery application cycle. The survey included questions about participant demographics, pre-interview preparation, virtual interview experiences, and post-interview process. Statistical comparisons were performed on responses using SPSS.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine participants responded to the survey, representing a 27.0% response rate. Applicants received an average of 13.3 IIs (range 0-45) and attended an average of 11.4 interviews (range 0-30). Almost half (48.2%) did not feel IIs were distributed equitably and more than half (68.2%) reported that there should be a limit on the number of IIs an applicant can accept. The majority of respondents (88.1%) reported spending $500 or less on virtual interviews. Half (50.6%) participated in virtual sub-internships, of which 30.4% became significantly less interested in a program afterwards.
CONCLUSIONS: The inaugural virtual interview cycle had several advantages and disadvantages. Lessons learned from this year could be utilized towards building a more equitable, fair, and effective potential virtual cycle in years to come.
PMID:35939639 | DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009521
