Acta Biotheor. 2022 Aug 13;70(4):22. doi: 10.1007/s10441-022-09446-2.
ABSTRACT
Causal pluralism can be defended not only in respect to causal concepts and methodological guidelines, but also at the finer-grained level of causal inference from a particular source of evidence for causation. An argument for this last variety of pluralism is made based on an analysis of causal inference from randomized experiments (RCTs). Here, the causal interpretation of a statistically significant association can be established via multiple paths of reasoning, each relying on different assumptions and providing distinct elements of information in favour of a causal interpretation.
PMID:35962877 | DOI:10.1007/s10441-022-09446-2
